Bathurst Airport waste of money

Published Wednesday May 14th, 2008
a7

To Laurence Cannon, Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities:

Recently, I have learned through the media that the Bathurst Airport Commission has applied to both the provincial and federal government for a 30 million dollars subsidy in order to build a new airport alongside Route 8, between Bathurst and Allardville, N.B. Their goal is to have a runway long enough to be able to accommodate the safe landing of planes with a 200 passenger capacity. Quite the dream! Where's the reality? You must realize that 80 per cent of passengers from the northern part on N.B. drive themselves to Moncton to take a plane. It is not a new infrastructure that will encourage the people of this northern area of the province to make Bathurst their departure airport. If your government has 30 million dollars taxpayers' money to waste, why not consider sharing this money with laid-off workers from the Miramichi and Dalhousie area that have recently lost their jobs?

Here's another reality check! Many business people travel to New York to lure new investors to the area. They no longer need to take the plane to Montreal and then transfer to New York. There is now a direct flight service available from Moncton! Business people no longer need "Air Canada Jazz" to access the world for business!

Here's another argument to consider! Often, Chaleur and Acadian Peninsula people, tend to forget that Restigouche is part of Northern New Brunswick. The question is: Why keep on spending money in Chaleur and Acadian Peninsula while putting aside the Restigouche area? If money is to be spent for northern New Brunswick, Restigouche should get its fair share and not limit the spending to only two areas!

In closing, I certainly hope that one could still find a conscientious government person that will affirm himself to put a stop to wasting precious and valuable taxpayer's moneys. One must not forget that Charlo Airport has the needed infrastructures in place to accommodate larger air carriers. It is cooperation between the different northern areas this is needed and not new infrastructures.... at taxpayers' cost! Only the future will be able to tell if there is a willingness for these communities to work together rather than working against each other.

I wish to thank you, Mr. Minister Cannon, for taking into consideration my concerns and I can assure you my full cooperation in regards to this issue.

Donald Arseneau

Charlo

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (3)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

The thing is, the Bathurst airport, because it was small made it affordable for the airline to use, always operated fiancially secure, without operating funds from government, unlike Charlo.

Bathurst was, far more than Charlo, able to fill its airplanes, as it continues to do today. There was a time when the local business community had to make a financial commitment to the service, and they succeeded quite well.

As for ignoring Restigouche, I think this man has a bee in his bonnet, and no matter if it makes sense to put a longer runway in Bathurst he would be against it. I think the jury is still out of if its a good idea to build a new runway or not.

Geographically, it just makes more sense to have the airport in Bathurst to serve Restigouche, Chaleur and the Penninsula.





2
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 14/05/08 06:23:29 AM ADT
The Bathurst Airport never should have been in existence. Charlo has far better facilities, a longer runway, and better weather (less fog). Now Bathurst wants to be better and wants gov't $$ to help ... well Charlo was built with gov't $$. The investment has been made and I, as a taxpayer, do not want to see my tax dollars going towards this.
3
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 15/05/08 01:16:29 PM ADT
The Government should never allowed funds to Bathurst Airport nor should it do so in the future for such things as runway expansion. As a taxpayer we invested lots of money into making a fine regional airport in Charlo and all that has been wasted.

Up-to-date ILS (Instrument Landing System) equipment made Charlo an excellent 'all weather' airport and to date Bathurst Airport does not have such a system to my knowledge. Unfortunately, Nav Canada decommissioned the ILS a couple years ago leaving the airport with similar navigation equipment as Bathurst.

Air Canada only puts small capacity airplanes on the Bathurst route and the cost is considerably higher to fly into Bathurst when compared to driving to Moncton and driving north which a lot of 'northerners' do. Couple that with seat availability now wonder more Northerns drive to Moncton. So, what's the difference for Bathurst & Acadian Penn travelers having to drive to Charlo -- other than more time on the road to Moncton.
2
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
T. Wright, Greater Moncton on 19/05/08 10:36:23 AM ADT
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles